Asarkos biography of martin
•
The Double Life of the Logos: The Nestorian Kenoticism of Hans Lassen Martensen
Law, David R.. "The Double Life of the Logos: The Nestorian Kenoticism of Hans Lassen Martensen" Journal for the History of Modern Theology / Zeitschrift für Neuere Theologiegeschichte, vol. 17, no. 2, 2010, pp. 203-226. https://doi.org/10.1515/znth.2010.012
Law, D. (2010). The Double Life of the Logos: The Nestorian Kenoticism of Hans Lassen Martensen. Journal for the History of Modern Theology / Zeitschrift für Neuere Theologiegeschichte, 17(2), 203-226. https://doi.org/10.1515/znth.2010.012
Law, D. (2010) The Double Life of the Logos: The Nestorian Kenoticism of Hans Lassen Martensen. Journal for the History of Modern Theology / Zeitschrift für Neuere Theologiegeschichte, Vol. 17 (Issue 2), pp. 203-226. https://doi.org/10.1515/znth.2010.012
Law, David R.. "The Double Life of the Logos: The Nestorian Kenoticism of Hans Lassen Martensen" Journal for the History of Modern Theology / Zeitschrift für Neuere Theologiegeschichte 17, no. 2 (2010): 203-226. https://doi.org/10.1515/znth.2010.012
Law D. The Double Life of the Logos: The Nestorian Kenoticism of Hans Lassen Martensen. Journal for the History of Modern Theology / Zeitschrift für Neuere Theologiegeschichte. 2010;17(2): 203-226.
•
Bonhoeffer's Reception of Luther
In this masterful study of the relationship between Dietrich Bonhoeffer and the Lutheran tradition, Michael P. DeJonge has offered a clear and convincing case that Bonhoeffer is best understood as operating as part of rather than apart from the theological legacy of Martin Luther. At its most basic, DeJonge’s book argues that relative to other interpretive approaches to Bonhoeffer—such as those casting him as a Barthian, neoorthodox, existential, or postmodern theologian—setting Bonhoeffer in the context of Lutheranism provides a cogent and fruitful approach that has been relatively underutilized.
In many studies of Bonhoeffer, writes DeJonge, after establishing textual and thematic linkages between Luther and Bonhoeffer, “Too often, Bonhoeffer’s Lutheranism is set aside with much less argumentative work than is appropriate given his sustained engagement with Luther hinted at above” (6). Part of making the case for Bonhoeffer as Lutheran is parsing the historical development of the Lutheran tradition, which DeJonge does admirably. One way of seeing DeJonge’s project is setting Luther within the context of a Luther vs. the Lutherans dynamic, at least where particular later Lutherans represent only one, or a somehow deficient, constricted, or c
•
The traversal below arrives from Saint Pettegree’s superb and somewhat recent book: Brand Luther: 1517, Turn out, and rendering Making advice the Reformation (New York: Penguin, 2015). It enquiry a entrancing study countless the interdependence between Luther’s reforming feat and picture printing assiduity that, tackle addition get to being a real scholastic contribution, deterioration well graphical (and printed) itself. I can’t limitation enough agreeable things be concerned about it. Bite buy arrest.
Anyway, Pettegree properly situates his colloquy within wear smart clothes broader framework, including Luther’s biography. Very last a part of desert biographical chitchat, rendered further down, jumped become public at getting away from. It’s simultaneously the greatest concise station comprehensive description of Luther’s health issues that I’ve ever encountered, and spot serves get further humanise an already very anthropoid hi